Newsletter
Language
Language:
 
News
Archival Issues
Volume 19, 2017
Volume 18, 2016
Volume 17, 2015
Volume 16, 2014
Volume 15, 2013
Volume 14, 2012
Volume 13, 2011
Volume 12, 2010
Volume 11, 2009
Volume 10, 2008
Volume 9, 2007
Volume 8, 2006
Volume 7, 2005
Volume 6, 2004
Volume 5, 2003
Volume 4, 2002
Volume 3, 2001
Volume 2, 2000
Volume 1, 1999
Search
 » 
Journal Abstract
 
Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Cementless Avantage Cup in Patients with Risk of Hip Prosthesis Instability
Jacek Semenowicz, Adam Mroczka, Anita Kajzer, Wojciech Kajzer, Bogdan Koczy, Jan Marciniak
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2014; 16(3):253-263
ICID: 1112282
Article type: Original article
IC™ Value: 3.00
Abstract provided by Publisher
 
Background. The aim of the study was to assess total hip arthroplasty procedures using the cementless Avantage cup in women with additional risk factors for postoperative hip instability.
Material and methods. A total of 280 cementless Avantage and Avantage Reload cups were implanted in 260 women aged between 29 and 79 years (60.9 years on average) in the years 2004–2010. In 217 women, there was at least one additional risk factor for prosthesis dislocation. The survival of the cup was assessed by using the necessity of cup replacement as an endpoint of the study. The statistical analyses used the Fisher test to assess the difference in the necessity of revision surgery between the Avantage and Avantage Reload cups, and the Kaplan Meier method was used to evaluate the effective functioning time of the prosthesis. Additionally, tests were conducted on the surface layer of 2 not used and 4 removed cups.
Results. 239 patients (259 arthroplasties) were subjected to the final examination. The follow-up period ranged from 2.7 to 9.7 years, 7.0 years on average. None of the patients demonstrated postoperative prosthesis instability. Aseptic loosening was observed in 19 cups in 18 women (7.3%). Intra-prosthetic dislocation occurred 4 times, and in two cases it was combined with loosening of the cup. Revision surgery was required more often in patients with the Avantage cup (9.5%, 17 out of 179) in comparison to the Avantage Reload (2.5%, 2 out of 80). However, the observed differences did not reach the level of statistical significance. The cumulative survival rate of the Avantage cup was 0.94 at 5 years and 0.86 at 8 years.
Conclusions. 1. Avantage cups reduce the risk of postoperative hip instability. 2. Patients with cementless Avantage cups should be closely monitored for signs of aseptic loosening.

ICID 1112282

DOI 10.5604/15093492.1112282
PMID 25058101 - click here to show this article in PubMed
 
FULL TEXT 894 KB


Related articles
  • in IndexCopernicus™
         endoprotezoplastyka [0 related records]
         complications [209 related records]
         Risk Factors [14302 related records]
         dislocation [9 related records]
         dual mobility cup [0 related records]
         Arthroplasty [34 related records]
         Hip [39 related records]

  • Related articlesin PubMed database
  • in PubMed database [ related records]


  •  

    Copyright © Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja  2017
    Page created by Index Copernicus Ltd. All Rights reserved.