Newsletter
Language
Language:
 
News
Archival Issues
Volume 19, 2017
Volume 18, 2016
Volume 17, 2015
Volume 16, 2014
Volume 15, 2013
Volume 14, 2012
Volume 13, 2011
Volume 12, 2010
Volume 11, 2009
Volume 10, 2008
Volume 9, 2007
Volume 8, 2006
Volume 7, 2005
Volume 6, 2004
Volume 5, 2003
Volume 4, 2002
Volume 3, 2001
Volume 2, 2000
Volume 1, 1999
Search
 » 
Journal Abstract
 
Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life after the Implantation of Modular Prostheses of the Proximal Femur in Patients with Cancer Metastases
Grzegorz Guzik
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2016; 18(3):231-238
ICID: 1212867
Article type: Original article
IC™ Value: 3.00
Abstract provided by Publisher
 
Background. Surgical treatment of pathological fractures of the proximal femur with intramedullary rods produces good short-term outcomes, but after some time the fixation often becomes unstable in patients with a good prognosis and a repeat surgery is required. Modular prostheses allow for better long-term outcomes.
Material and methods. A total of 64 surgical resection procedures for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur combined with the implantation of modular prostheses were performed at the Oncological Orthopaedics Department in Brzozów in 2010-2014. Modular prostheses were used in cases of extensive bone loss involving the proximal femoral epiphysis and metaphysis in patients in a good general condition. All patients were assessed with respect to their condition, pain intensity (VAS scale) and physical function according to the Karnofsky scale. After surgery, the patients underwent additional assessment of gait efficiency and performance with the MSTS and HHS scores. A total of 38 women and 26 men were operated on. The mean age was 66 years among the women and 69 years among the men. The follow-up period ranged from 3.6 to 1.2 years (1.8 years on average).
Results. A total of 28 GMRS (Stryker) and 36 MUTARS (Implantcast) endoprostheses were implanted. The implants were fixed with cement in 19 cases and cementless in 45 cases. All patients reported an improved quality of life after surgery. Mean pain intensity measured in a VAS scale was 3.8 and the Karnofsky physical function score was 65. Mean gait efficiency and performance assessed in the HHS and MSTS scores at 6 weeks post surgery was 75 and 20 points, respectively. All patients were able to walk and the majority could do so without crutches or using one crutch. Complications were rare. One patient experienced a massive relapse with implant loosening. There were no deep infections requiring implant removal and no implant loosening or dislocation.
Conclusions. 1. Surgical treatment of bony metastases with modular prostheses leads to good outcomes. 2. As a surgical solution, modular prostheses considerably improve the quality of life and show slight positive progress in post-operative follow-up. 3. Complications in the form of infections, implant loosening or tumour relapse found in the patients were consistent with other literature reports.

ICID 1212867

DOI 10.5604/15093492.1212867
PMID 28157079 - click here to show this article in PubMed
 
FULL TEXT 532 KB


Related articles
  • in IndexCopernicus™
         post-resection prosthetic reconstruction of bone [0 related records]
         bone tumour resection [0 related records]
         bone metastases [24 related records]
         protezoplastyka poresekcyjna kości [0 related records]
         resekcje guzów kości [0 related records]

  • Related articlesin PubMed database
  • in PubMed database [ related records]


  •  

    Copyright © Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja  2017
    Page created by Index Copernicus Ltd. All Rights reserved.