Newsletter
Language
Language:
 
News
Archival Issues
Volume 19, 2017
Volume 18, 2016
Volume 17, 2015
Volume 16, 2014
Volume 15, 2013
Volume 14, 2012
Volume 13, 2011
Volume 12, 2010
Volume 11, 2009
Volume 10, 2008
Volume 9, 2007
Volume 8, 2006
Volume 7, 2005
Volume 6, 2004
Volume 5, 2003
Volume 4, 2002
Volume 3, 2001
Volume 2, 2000
Volume 1, 1999
Search
 » 
Journal Abstract
 
Minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty
Piotr Wojciechowski, Damian Kusz Kusz, Konrad Kopeć, Marcin Borowski
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007; 9(1):1-7
ICID: 473352
Article type: Review article
IC™ Value: 5.70
Abstract provided by Publisher
 
The success of orthopedic surgery depends on quick recovery of limb function. Every injury to a muscle or its attachment is associated with decreased muscle strength and disturbed proprioception, impeding recovery. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is performed through a short skin incision, avoiding injury to muscles and tendons. In Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) the advantages of MIS over classic techniques include faster recovery, shorter rehabilitation and hospitalization time, decreased blood loss, less pain and less scarring. The anterior approach to the hip, described by Robert Jones in 1947 as a modified Smith-Petersen approach, follows the principles of MIS. Other approaches promoted as minimally invasive (posterior, lateral, or double incision) are associated with muscle and/or tendon injury, and should thus be referred to as Less Invasive Surgery (LIS). Complications in THA operations using MIS occur most often in women affected by osteoporosis, older than 65, or with a BMI of more than 32. The rate of complications doubles with surgeons who perform less than 50 THAs per year. A special set of instruments facilitates implantation of the endoprosthesis and reduces the number of complications. The anterior approach allows for endoprosthesis implantation without damage to muscles and muscle insertions, reduces tissue damage, and, more importantly, decreases postoperative pain. Should complications occur, the anterior approach has the advantage of simple access to the proximal femur by extending the approach distally, as in the Smith-Petersen technique. However, the technical challenges of MIS and the risk of complications dictate caution.


ICID 473352
 
FULL TEXT 446 KB


Related articles
  • in IndexCopernicus™
         less invasive surgery [2 related records]
         total hip replacement [19 related records]
         anterior approach [1 related records]


  •  

    Copyright © Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja  2017
    Page created by Index Copernicus Ltd. All Rights reserved.